5 Best Ways to Build a Mobile App in 2021

93 / 100

Have you ever thought about how to build a mobile app?, Oh well I’m going to assume yes because you landed here on this article.

I have been a software engineer for nearly 10 years. Throughout my career, I’ve worked with five viable early-stage internet companies. At first, only two programs could be used when venturing into mobile app development —Objective-C or Java. Basically, with these, you had two options. You could build your own Android app with one and iOS for the other. Well, that’s it.

There are a lot more options out there in the app world today. If you’re interested in app development, you can learn which options are the best for you to explore. This can be very technical, but some of them are not that technical at all.

I spent a lot of time writing this guide to show you the five different ways to build an app from scratch. I also used a structured methodology with 5 different components to create your own app: One criterion I used was how professional you need to be to build an app. There are hardcore programmers on one end of the spectrum, while on the other end, there are tech-savvy people. One more metric was how scalable the approach would be on how to create an app.

For example, you might have app development tools that are very versatile with how it’s set up [OR]; You need to be up to date technically to use it. Alternatives might include a program that allows people to do certain things without the need to know how to code at all, but you might want to learn a little programming later on to tailor the framework to your use case’s specificities.

I’ll show you two graphs side-by-side. One will show how many users within a given amount of time. This is a helpful visualization to see where the method falls on the continuum and where it positions in the vacuum. Let’s dive straight in!.

1. HYBRID APPS DEVELOPMENT

Build a Mobile App

Most hybrid app architecture depends on Javascript technologies. You can build once and distribute it to multiple platforms. So if you’re learning how to create a hybrid app, you can make it work for iOS, Android, and possibly other platforms as well.

Hybrid creation tools include Titanium from Appcelerator, PhoneGap Cordova, Ionic, and React Native.

This approach is advantageous when you want a set of developers, and you want to build it all once—then go straight to the market with iOS and Android. The difficulty is low to medium. You don’t have to be as skilled as a low-level developer; as long as you know JavaScript, you can build a mobile app.

Since you’re using Javascript to run the app, there will be a slight performance hit that you need to take into account.

However, with today’s hardware and Internet speeds, the performance metric is diminishing drastically. There are top-rated hybrid apps out there that are UI-intensive. One example is our Swiftspeed Appcreator App, which was made with IONIC on our app maker platform. It’s doing incredibly well to build a mobile app in a fraction of time and cost.

You’re also going to want to make sure you reassess these metrics every couple of years. The dynamics of phones and the speed of the network will be different over time.

But just as everybody used to learn how to create a low-level coding app at the start, they’re now turning more toward hybrid applications. The key reason for this is the business side of app growth. You can save a lot of time and money on a hybrid mobile app versus a fully native development.

2. CODING AT LOW LEVEL TO BUILD A MOBILE APP

%Swiftspeed Appcreator%App Maker

With a low level of coding, the complexity is considerable. To become a specialized app developer, you will first need to learn a more specialized skill. As a software application, the efficiency is very high at a low level of coding. As for the majority of the population, the main drawback is that you need to be a developer to build an app from scratch with low-level coding. Otherwise, you may not be able to create an app effectively.

The limit of versatility is reached here.

This is the best choice for frame rate when creating an augmented reality app or a game. It is so flexible. Another justification for using this option the more; Is if you are working with a personalized machine.

Low-level coding is the most time consuming and most costly way to create an app, but you get the most power out of it.

3. USING RAPID APP DEVELOPMENT (RAD) TO BUILD A MOBILE APP

Rapid app development tools, RAD for short, are used to create apps. There are tools like OutSystems, Kinvey, and Kony. They allow you to make an intuitive mobile application.

Usually, rapid app development platforms claim that they don’t require technical knowledge to use them.

However, if you want to do something significant about your project, you have to lean on the technological side. You’re not going to have to be as advanced as you might have to build a low-level coding app. But it’s in the medium range.

Here’s what I’m saying. You’re going to have to know what you’re doing from a technological perspective, but you won’t have to learn how to code anything from scratch to create these platforms.

But literally, rapid app development helps you get on the market quicker (hence the name), and there’s a lot of pre-built features.

There are also several disadvantages to the rapid development of apps. Apart from the need to be very technical to do something important, you’re still limited to the medium you’re using. You can only use whatever the platform has to offer in terms of functionality.

You’re just going to customize their tools and options in a way that works for you.

These are perfect if you’re creating applications internally with some organizational operation or maybe an interface for your workers. It’s all right to use RAD if you don’t intend to keep it on your own or paying someone to keep it for you.

4. BY USING COOKIE CUTTER APP MAKER

Swiftspeed Appcreator design

What is a cookie-cutter app maker? You may even be familiar with some of these methods that are on the market and available today. Popular examples are Appypie and Andromo.

For a cookie-cutter platform, the applications that run under it are actually just one piece of the puzzle that gets reconfigured every time a new implementation is performed. This is what I mean by this.

Cookie-cutter applications are usually brilliantly designed. It is easy to use, considering the intuitive interface. You can adjust the app’s configuration using the software and modify it to suit your own tastes. It is simple for the user to add their own photos and text to the platform and use the app’s features like the “pin” or “like” buttons.

At its base, a cookie-cutter app is essentially only one program where some features are turned on or off to change the app’s overall appearance.

The settings here are pretty easy to comprehend. The graphics of the software are also very low-quality.

If your app is just a hobby, this is a good option. And maybe you want to build a mobile app for something that’s just “nice to have” rather than something vital to your business.

If you really want to be on the market fast, build a mobile app, and keep your budget pretty tight, that’s a nice solution. You’re going to be able to manage it on your own, too. However, the downside to using this software development approach is that you are likely to hit the ceiling at some stage when it comes to your app’s features. You will inevitably try to do some things, and the platform won’t allow it to happen. Basically, you’re waiting for the platform to fulfill your needs.

But if you don’t see your mobile app expanding to the point that you’re growing out of the network, these cookie-cutter applications could be a nice alternative to your condition.

5. LASTLY, USING SWIFTSPEED APPCREATOR TO BUILD A MOBILE APP

Swiftspeed Appcreator features image

As the CEO here at Swiftspeed Appcreator, I may be slightly biased here. I know the platform quite well. But I always want to be honest with you and give you the pros and cons.

Swiftspeed Appcreator helps people with no technical expertise build an iOS and Android app leveraging our vast marketplace with a plethora of functionality connected upon building their mobile apps. In fact, we have a dedicated development team ready to build any functionality that is not already available on our platform but required by customers.

It’s also available to the developer ecosystem since our platform is open source, and they’re always introducing more functionality to it.

Here’s one of the key discrepancies between Swiftspeed Appcreator and other app builder platform on the market today. If you feel like you and your app need a special feature or a piece of functionality that has not yet been created, you can get your own developers to produce it utilizing our SDK. They can build functionality in a manner that is close to hybrid application development.

Alternatively, you may contact Swiftspeed to take advantage of its white-label program and resell apps. Swiftspeed developers will build this custom feature for you. Like I already stated, I’m clearly a little bit biased here. But in the sense of being fair, I’m going to clarify scenarios where Swiftspeed Appcreator might not be the ideal option to build a mobile app.

If you’re attempting to create a virtual reality app, Swiftspeed Appcreator is definitely not for you, at least for now. In the coming years, it might shift. Whether you’re attempting to make a first-person shooter game or build the next TikTok, it won’t be the right option for you either. However, we have many game source code users can leverage to build nice games.

Will you do that? It’s totally up to you. I don’t mean that the skills aren’t there. But professionally speaking, it’s easier to go for low-level production and use Swift or Java to build your app in certain situations.
However, for everyone else out there who wants to be on the market fast and wants the product to scale with their needs, Swiftspeed Appcreator is an incredibly effective platform.

Swiftspeed Appcreator helps you use both the app-building components and the back-end infrastructure to significantly reduce the continuing costs of growth.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

What’s the safest way to build a mobile app?
Now that we’ve been through the five different app development process, it’s time to resolve everyone’s burning question—which one is the greatest or the best?

Realistically speaking, there are no correct answers here. The approach that you prefer depends on your particular requirements. Perhaps the best way to build an app for me is not the best way for you or your company.

It all depends on the degree of technological competence and how much flexibility you require. Here’s a short rundown of the five strategies mentioned above:

Low-level coding—Extremely complex yet incredibly customizable. This software creation process is expensive and time-consuming, but you can do just about everything with it.

Hybrid App Development—You can build a mobile app once and distribute it to different channels utilizing JavaScript technologies. It’s always fairly scientific, but the versatility is a little lower than low-level coding.

It’s ideal for people who like to manage their platform and don’t want to outsource it all. For hybrid applications, you may put it in-house and not necessarily use a single service out there.

Rapid Software Production (RAD)—A perfect choice for all of you who don’t mind rolling up your sleeves and getting to work. It’s not very academic, but you can’t be scared to explore a bit and do some work to handle it yourself.

RAD is a reasonable solution for internal use when you are not too concerned about UI, results, and stuff of that nature. It may be expensive, depending on the network you’re using. All such networks are likely to provide an infrastructure that can support you and a service layer that will create stuff for you.

Cookie Cutter Apps—A very nice option if the software is only a hobby because you’re trying to hold the budget as minimal as possible. Not recommended for applications that are vital to your company. If you want to have an app out there fast and don’t care about features, cookie cutters are typically beautiful and cheap.

Swiftspeed Appcreator—This approach helps you build a mobile app from scratch with no technological expertise. Even if you have technological expertise, you can use Swiftspeed Appcreator to do anything you want to do with your software. Alternatively, you’ve got our developers to make something for you.

It even has a backend infrastructure that you can access. This approach means that you don’t have to deal with database servers, protection, regulation, and the like. Swiftspeed Appcreator will take care of all this for you.

Swiftspeed Appcreator is the perfect route for those who want to reach the ground running. The app is going to save you time and resources. As your needs expand, you won’t be locked into a forum. It’s perfect because it helps the creators or their internal developers extend the product to create whatever you want.

Concluding
Do you want to learn how to create an app? You need to pick an app development method before you get underway. Five key solutions need to be addressed.

Choose the approach that meets your technological ability level and the needs of your app. It all depends on how scalable the approach is and how professional you are.

I hope that this guide can easily illustrate all the choices for app development. You can use it to make the best decision for you and your business.

If you have any other concerns, please feel free to reach out to let me know. Good luck to you!